ELECTRONIC CHARACTER ASSASSINATIONS
“ I felt you the membership should be made aware of the true despicable nature of these persons who try to portray themselves as Unionist, who will go to ANY deceitful lengths of slimy behavior, legally or illegally. You all have my permission to past the email I sent to the E Board, around to ALL members so they can see what kind of despicable people they really are.” (All misspelling and capital letters were copied as written.)
I was appalled. Here he is making personal attacks on the other members of executive board. Now, in any organization it is normal for there to be differences—especially when the group is as diverse as our union. There will be debate, discussions, and disagreements, sometimes heated. Most of the members of the local realize this and treat it for what it is—just a fact of doing business. This is true in our local also. I have seen the members of the executive board disagree, discuss and then compromise in an effort to do what is best for the local. Sometimes one side prevails; sometimes the other—the discussions are never personal. Bullfrog’s attacks though are simply attacks on character of the other members of the local executive board. He makes those attacks for personal and professional gain.
In this case, he was angry that other board members did not respond to an earlier e-mail concerning a missing computer thumb drive. He accused two of the board members of stealing the device, without any evidence. Unable to get a response, he made an irrational attack on all of the members of the local board—a no fact attack. It was shocking enough that sent the e-mail to other members, but he had to go one step beyond; he sent the e-mail to APWU National Officers, other locals in the country, and even to people who are in USPS management, which causes me again to wonder why he involves management in the affairs of the local. One of the members of the local executive board, who is tired of bullfrog’s attacks, told me he even contacted an attorney in order to pursue a defamation suit against the bullfrog. Now, as if this character assassination was not enough, the bullfrog continues to make infantile and poorly thought out electronic personal attacks on the other members of the local executive board. I know I have seen and read the documentation that others have sent or given me.
I received a web site address and printed copies from the site from one of my sources. It is a site set up by the bullfrog. On that site he continues his pathetic personal attacks. It was just awful. He has a section on his site titled the “Dog Pound” in that he has listed the names of several members of the local. I was able to access the “Dog Pound” and I was shocked. There were things written there that were simply sad little personal attacks on good members of the local. There is also a section titled “The Fire Hydrant Award.” You can only guess what he means by that. In that section he makes a personal attack on one of the women members of the local board. The attack was personal in nature and completely irrelevant to any issue affecting the local. He makes attacks on union members, but never makes any statements about management. This is from a person who stated in his campaign literature that he would take a strong stance against management and who claims on his web site to be 150% for Union solidarity, though I have not seen it yet. Of course, when bullfrog found out that other members were reading what he had written he quickly tried to cover his tracks by changing his web site and denying access to it by others. I am wondering what the Union company that is selling the web space for unions to use would say if they saw that their site was is being used to attack union members.
The election is coming. We only have about 170 days until we get a new local president. The members of the local should keep in mind what the bullfrog has done while in office--attacking members and helping management, when the time comes to elect a new local president. In the mean time, the members as a whole need to keep the bullfrog in check, when he shows up at the picnic, the National Convention, or the next membership meeting he needs to be confronted by you the members as you deserve accountability and answers.
For more immediate answers, call him on his cell at 503-819-7298 or e-mail him at orbulldog1@verizon.net or gstin29803@yahoo.com
15 comments:
Sounds like Stinson needs to sober up and stay out of the bars and come back down to reality!
Here is a solution to your upcoming election. Get a few digital pictures of Stinson's vehicle and him entering the bar and/or strip clubs or lingerie modeling agencies; and post them on your blog site or email them out. Even better, while on union time. That should resolve your issues.
There's enough lies, threats, bullying, harassment, collusion with management, misuse of member's dues for personal gain, incompetence, refusal to abide by the will of the membership, etc. on the record to show that Greg shouldn't be elected to office again. Why resort to the same type of attacks he uses? Greg is a liar and a coward. He harasses women for his own twisted reasons. He lies to protect the other lies he tells you and himself. He ignores the members except when he needs someone to lie to. He doesn't come to meetings cause he's scared of having to explain what the heck he's been doing for $60K a year. He fabricates lies about stewards, E-board officers, and members to try to deflect attention away from what he's done. He doesn't care about you, me, or anybody except himself. He demands attention like a little child, and throws tantrums when angry and runs away when scared. He has no integrity, and cannot be trusted --- except to do the wrong thing. Let members know what he really is: an empty promise, a boast of hot air, a sweaty swagger, a bully to women, a liar.
Perhaps having Stinson as our president these last 2+ years is not such a bad thing.
Just as a community comes together after a natural disaster, it appears that the remainder of the Executive Board have come together to work as a tight-knit team to keep this Local functioning in spite of Stinson.
When a person loses on of their senses, the body adjusts and makes the other senses better: more acute. This has happened here as well. Collectively and individually, the officers of this Local are better officers, better Unionists, and the only thing that has kept this Local from being handed to management on a silver platter.
The nightmare is almost over. I have heard rumor that Brian Dunsmore will be running for the office of President in the next election. With all that he has done to perform the duties of Vice-President, President in Greg's frequent absences, and corrector of the things Greg screws up, he has my vote!
The e-board members that I know are officers that are dedicated to the membership (Greg excluded). Dunsmore has stepped up and held the local together, doing the work that Greg hasn't been willing, able, or in attendance, to do.
Many of you may not know Dunsmore. He was working at the Sunset DDC when he was elected to the position or VP. He has spent of great deal of time educating himself on our contract, handbooks and manuals. I have seen him in action as an arbitration advocate. If I was in need of an advocate, he would be my choice. He will have my vote and full support in the upcoming election. I don't care who else is running.
So, we know what kind of leader we don't want.
What kind of leader do we need?
Sorry, I'm busy and the union is all about money for politicians-not about what is happening on the workroom floor.
Quit panhandling for COPA and start listening to us.
Not sure what work area you're at, but there is hardly any talk about COPA where I'm at. If you think you're not being heard by the elected officers, you should call the office, go to a meeting, write a letter to the editor of the Poker, etc. This local needs people to get involved. See you at the picnic on Sunday the 10th?
Why do you all keep picking on Greg? I am sure that if you were new you would make mistakes too. Why don't the rest of the executive board help him? Why do they keep making it hard for him to do his job. I think that he is a good change from the good ol boy group we have had in office for years. It seems that Dunn is still pulling the strings of the current executive board, except for Greg.
Your post is filled with statements that go in various directions. How do you know that the e-board didn't try to help and work with Greg? Why wasn't Greg ready to be president? Didn't he say he was ready to be president by running for the office? First it's "poor inexperienced Greg" then you throw out the last-ditch
"good ol' boy" crap that Greg and his followers have thrown out. Is that really what you want to say to defend Greg's actions? He doesn't know what he's doing, and he doesn't play well with others? That sounds like a great campaign slogan.
He was elected in 2005 and started being president in January of 2006. After two and a half years he's not new. If he can't do the job by now he will never be able to. We need a president that can do the job.
Don't you, the Gray Hater, have anything else to write about besides President Stinson. Get a life!!
Hmmm. Someones got time to read this blog, go to comments, and leave a comment. Then tell the Gray Writer to get a life. Someone has too much time on their hands, to go along with their affection for Stinson.
Overpunctuation is a sure sign of insanity.
Hater!!!!!
Post a Comment